• Our Chat Rooms are currently down. Please ask your questions by emailing us at contact at askthejudge.info.

    What will it take for Congress to act on gun control?

    Date: 12.17.12 | by Judge Tom.

    You may be on your Christmas or winter vacation from school and won’t have a chance to discuss this in class until you return. We thought we’d throw out some thoughts about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings on December 14, 2012.

    Undoubtedly, there will be ample discussion across the country about school safety, gun control, metal detectors, etc. It may be time for our leaders in local, state and federal government to do more than posture themselves for re-election. Now that six and seven-year-old children have become targets, we need to act in the interest of all citizens. What will the next miscreant do – shoot up a nursery in a maternity ward? Will that get the attention of Congress to consider rational gun control or is the Second Amendment so inviolable that there is no limit? Or would a shooting at a school where politicians’ children attend wake them up? We face serious questions about our future and culture as a people.

    In January, 2011, nine-year-old Christina-Taylor Green was the youngest victim of a parking lot shooting spree by a 22-year-old man in Tucson, Arizona. Her death caused a torrent of attention to stricter gun control laws since now a child was sacrificed to our insistence on not messing with the Second Amendment. It allows any adult to own weapons to protect his life and property. Exceptions are recognized but gun-control advocates want greater restrictions on the sale of certain high-caliber weapons, ammunition and clips (magazines that hold dozens of bullets). As it stands today, ownership requires registration and a background check but these rules don’t apply to private sales or sales at gun shows. The passing of a nine-year old child from gun violence resulted in little change in either the law or culture surrounding the Second Amendment debate. Now we have twenty children sacrificed on the altar of “gun rights” and personal freedom. 

    Flags at half-mast in Washington, D.C.

    It’s somewhat ironic that the following day, December 15, 2012, marked the 221st anniversary of the Bill of Rights. The nation’s first memorial* to the Bill of Rights was dedicated in Phoenix, Arizona. The memorial consists of ten stone monuments standing ten feet tall. Each has the words of the Amendment carved into its surface. As you know, several of the amendments come into play regarding the issue of gun control in America. Obviously, the second amendment which states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Also the First Amendment guarantee regarding free speech protects all discussion about the remaining amendments including the vigorous debate about the Second Amendment.

    Talk with your family and friends about this. Isn’t it time for lawmakers to do something to protect innocent victims from gun violence? Should the basis of legislative decision-making be an individual’s personal future as an elected official or financial gain? Even if taking an unpopular stand on the issue means personal loss, doesn’t ethics and morals come into play? Or is our society solely about the bottom line to each politician, corporation or organization?

    Compromise is not a dirty word. Although it’s a painstaking development in current politics, shouldn’t a middle ground be sought on this issue? Two centuries of debate over the meaning of the Second Amendment will not give way to one side or the other. But compromise over rational changes to both ensure the individual’s right to own firearms balanced against the need to keep weapons from some persons should be attainable. Loopholes in the law must be closed. We have reached a tipping point where a national discussion on the subject must be followed by action.




    Judge Tom

    This post was written by Judge Tom. Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including the recently published 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing). When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    2 Comments subscribe to these comments.

    • Michael Olson
      Thu, 20 Dec 2012 at 09:48

      Great post Judge
      Thanks, Mike.

    • Dyan Barrieau
      Mon, 13 May 2013 at 03:29

      The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American the right to bear arms. Has any law ever been so ambiguous? What are arms? What does it mean to bear them? At least with the first amendment we know exactly where we stand: Freedom of speech. It couldn’t be any clearer. But, the right to bear arms leaves the second amendment open to different interpretations. We need gun permits to carry a concealed weapon. Do we need knife permits? No. Yet both can, and often do, cause death. We can own a gun, or a rifle, or a sub-machine gun, or a machete, and dozens of other tools to kill, even our own bare hands. So, gun control is a debate in our country that makes no sense unless you broaden the ban or acceptance to include all instruments of death.`:
      Thanks for your comments, Dyan.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>