• Our Chat Rooms are currently down. Please ask your questions by emailing us at contact at askthejudge.info.

    Fifth-grader’s drawing ends up in federal court

    Date: 04.25.12 | by Judge Tom.

    B. C. was 10 years-old and in the fifth grade at Berea Elementary School in New York. His science teacher handed out pictures of an astronaut and told the students to complete the pictures by writing a “wish” in the astronaut’s leg. The teacher became impatient with questions about the assignment and reportedly told them to write about “anything” and “write about missiles.”

    Using a crayon for the assignment, B. C. wrote “blow up the school with the teachers in it.” He showed it to a few friends who laughed. No evidence was presented that the drawing caused a stir or disruption at school. However, the school suspended B. C. for six days (five out-of-school days and one in-school suspension day). His parents disagreed with the discipline and sued the school district for violating their son’s freedom of expression.

    Albastrica Mititica (Flickr)

    A federal trial court ruled against B. C. and his parents in 2010. They took a further appeal and in March, 2012, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the school in a 2-1 decision.* The majority held that schools have “wide leeway” to punish students for threatening violence and that it was reasonably foreseeable that B. C.’s drawing could cause a substantial disruption.

    Judge Rosemary Pooler disagreed and wrote a dissenting opinion. She said “I am convinced that a jury could find that this young boy’s crude attempt at humor merely had the potential to cause mild amusement among his classmates–not alarm. . . . I believe that a jury could conclude that this young child’s stab at humor barely had the potential to cause a stir at school, let alone a substantial disruption.”

    B. C. and his parents may decide to appeal the decision to the U. S. Supreme Court.

    What do you think? How would the Supreme Court rule if they accept B. C.’s case? Do you think what he wrote  constituted a threat to the school or would have met the Tinker test of “material or substantial disruption” to the campus?

    *Cuff v. Valley Central School District (Second Circuit Ct. of App., March 22, 2012).

    Judge Tom

    This post was written by Judge Tom. Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including the recently published 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing). When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

    1 Comment subscribe to these comments.

    • garrickbrooks
      Thu, 26 Apr 2012 at 08:02

      Great Article