A shocking possibility from sexting
As you know, prosecutors need evidence to go forward with charges against someone. The evidence may be direct eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence. Sometimes law enforcement takes samples of hair, urine or blood to test or to do DNA analysis. Photographs are also used for identifying suspects. If there is something distinctive about a tattoo or its location, for example, it may become important in a criminal case.
An unnamed 17-year-old in Manassas, Virginia, probably didn’t consider any of this when he texted an explicit video to his 15-year-old girlfriend. A juvenile court judge issued a warrant in July, 2014, authorizing the police to take photos of his erect penis to be used at trial (evidence of sexting). Arrangements would be made for an injection at a local hospital to obtain the needed evidence.
After the warrant became public, cooler heads prevailed and the police decided not to pursue this avenue. The boy is charged with felony possession and manufacturing child pornography.
Just one more reason not to engage in sexting. The consequences may be forever.